<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft Syntax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.reverberate.org/2007/06/25/draft-syntax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.reverberate.org/2007/06/25/draft-syntax/</link>
	<description>parsing, performance, minimalism with C99</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lund</title>
		<link>http://blog.reverberate.org/2007/06/25/draft-syntax/comment-page-1/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 14:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.reverberate.org/2007/06/25/draft-syntax/#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>&quot; *(some-str)&quot;

Wouldn&#039;t &quot;+(some-str)&quot; be better for 1..n occurrences?

(apologies if this triple-posts ... connection trouble)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; *(some-str)&#8221;</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;+(some-str)&#8221; be better for 1..n occurrences?</p>
<p>(apologies if this triple-posts &#8230; connection trouble)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

