Comments on: C and C++ are CRAZY! http://blog.reverberate.org/2009/01/20/c-and-c-are-crazy/ parsing, performance, minimalism with C99 Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:15:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: josh http://blog.reverberate.org/2009/01/20/c-and-c-are-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-1162 josh Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:31:45 +0000 http://blog.reverberate.org/?p=86#comment-1162 @Alex: Yes, if there's a maximum nesting depth, you've moved from undecidable to merely exponential. :) But this is a good point. @orl: look at my blurb in the sidebar! :) @Alex: Yes, if there’s a maximum nesting depth, you’ve moved from undecidable to merely exponential. :) But this is a good point.

@orl: look at my blurb in the sidebar! :)

]]> By: orl http://blog.reverberate.org/2009/01/20/c-and-c-are-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-1160 orl Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:13:59 +0000 http://blog.reverberate.org/?p=86#comment-1160 What the hell is Gazelle? :) What the hell is Gazelle? :)

]]> By: Alex Stapleton http://blog.reverberate.org/2009/01/20/c-and-c-are-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-1159 Alex Stapleton Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:51:34 +0000 http://blog.reverberate.org/?p=86#comment-1159 Template instantiation is not turing complete as defined by the ISO 14882-2003 C++ standard due to the limitation on template nesting to a depth of 17. Sure, you can come up with some bizarre variant of C++ which is unparseable, but then it's not really C++. Template instantiation is not turing complete as defined by the ISO 14882-2003 C++ standard due to the limitation on template nesting to a depth of 17. Sure, you can come up with some bizarre variant of C++ which is unparseable, but then it’s not really C++.

]]>